How do flexible elements in a robot arm affect the perception of safety during a handshake?

Experiment: comparison of stiffness and flexibility in human-robot interaction

The study, published on arXiv in 2026, focuses on one of the most natural human gestures - a handshake - and its implementation in robot interactions. The research team led by Luigi Miranda conducted an experiment with 10 volunteers who performed a handshake with two versions of the same robot: one with rigid joints and the other equipped with flexible elements based on series elastic actuators (SEA). The aim was to compare the parameters of safety, comfort and naturalness of interaction as perceived by people.

During the experiment, objective data on the trajectory of the robot's end effector were recorded, and subjective information was collected using a questionnaire. The questionnaire focused on assessing safety, naturalness and confidence levels during the handshake. The results show that the version with flexible elements was perceived as safer and more comfortable, which suggests the potential importance of such solutions for robots designed to cooperate with humans in social environments.

Why can flexibility affect the perception of safety?

In the context of physical interactions between humans and robots, joint stiffness can lead to an unpleasant feeling of contact or risk of injury, especially if the movement is inconsistent or unpredictable. Introducing flexibility through series elastic actuators (SEA) allows for absorbing energy during contact, which reduces the forces acting on the human. This may be crucial in situations where the robot cannot accurately predict human movement - e.g., during a spontaneous handshake.

The study does not confirm, however, that flexibility increases physical safety in a technical sense (e.g., reduces forces to a safe level), but it shows that people feel more comfortable and confident during interaction. This means that the effect is primarily psychological - flexibility "resembles" human nature of movement, which increases trust in the robot.

Significance for the development of social robots and human-robot interaction.

The results of the study are significant for designing robots intended for collaboration with humans in everyday environments - such as healthcare, education, or customer service. If people perceive interactions with a robot as more natural and safe, acceptance of the technology may increase. Flexibility not only improves the user experience but can also support the development of social robots that are designed to interact closely with humans.

However, it is important to emphasize that the study concerned one type of interaction - a handshake - and it is not possible to infer from it the effectiveness of flexible elements in other situations, such as moving around a room or lifting objects. Therefore, the results are limited to the context of physical contact and cannot be automatically extended to other applications.

Limitations of the study and prospects for further research.

The study was conducted on a small group of volunteers - 10 people - which limits its representativeness. The lack of data on gender differences in the assessment of safety or comfort does not allow for deeper analysis, although the study included both women and men. In addition, the experiment concerned only one interaction - a handshake - which makes it impossible to generalize the results to other types of physical contact.

Further research should include a larger number of participants, diverse age groups, and application contexts. It is also worth investigating how flexibility affects long-term robot acceptance in everyday use - whether users still feel more comfortable after a few days of interaction, or whether the effect disappears.

It is important to emphasize that although the study did not show significant differences in physical safety parameters, such as maximum forces acting on the hand, its significance lies in understanding the psychological dynamics of trust. Flexibility, even if it does not reduce the risk of injury in a technical way, creates an illusion of controllability and predictability of robot movement - features that people associate with natural human interactions. This may be key to further developments in the field of social robotics, where user acceptance often depends not on technical parameters but on the quality of experience.

In the future, research can focus on analyzing the impact of flexibility in other types of physical interaction - such as touching a hand or supporting the body - which will allow for the creation of more comprehensive models of perceived safety. This approach may also support the development of design standards for collaborative robots that take into account not only technical aspects but also psychological and social interactions. collaborative robots, which consider not only technical aspects, but also the psychological and social aspects of interaction.